Son Battled Officers; Now Mom Fights Suit

Year after Shingle Springs shootout, deputies seek $8 million from widow

By Dorothy Korber - dkorber@sacbee.com  A carved post and a boulder mark the place where Eddie Mies gunned down his dad last year on the family's rustic homestead in Shingle Springs.

Up the hill a little farther, among the dusty pines and chaparral, stands another wooden post and a cairn of smaller rocks. This is where Mies, who was 34, died of bullet wounds from the ensuing gunbattle with El Dorado County deputies.

Three deputies and a police dog also were hit in the firefight that morning; all survived.

The bloody date was June 5, 2007. Karen Mies, staggering under the news that her son had murdered her husband, told a family friend she was grateful for one thing: The wounded deputies were alive.

One year later to the day, two of the deputies filed a civil lawsuit against the widow and the estate of her deceased husband, Arthur, and her son. Officers Jon Yaws and Greg Murphy – both recovered and back at work – each is suing the Mies family for $4 million for emotional distress, medical expenses, loss of earning capacity, and punitive damages.

Given her modest circumstances, the 66-year-old hospice nurse says their $8 million claim would be laughable – if the whole situation were not so heartbreaking.

"June 5 was a tragic day for me and my family, and it was a tragic day for the deputies who were injured," Karen Mies said. "We were all victims that day. But this lawsuit is victimizing our family again. What do they want? My husband's dead, my son's dead. Do they want my house and my 10-year-old car?"

In their lawsuit, Yaws and Murphy allege the Mies family was negligent in failing to control their troubled son Eddie, behavior that led to the gunbattle and their injuries. Yaws was wounded in the arm, chest and leg; Murphy was struck once in the leg.

In addition to their physical injuries, the suit alleges the deputies suffered anxiety and humiliation.

Such lawsuits by police officers are highly unusual – and hard to win, according to several experts in tort law. They point to a long-standing legal tenet called "the firefighter's rule," which generally precludes emergency workers injured in the line of duty from suing citizens.

"With the firefighter's rule, the reasoning is that they voluntarily agreed to undertake these risks – they know going in that fighting crime or fighting fires is dangerous," said Julie Davies, a professor at McGeorge School of Law. "Additionally, they are paid well to encounter the risks. They're given a whole packet of benefits to compensate them if they're injured, so allowing them to sue citizens would almost be like double taxation."

Davies said there's another consideration, as well: "If people worry that they might be sued by police officers or firefighters, they might hesitate to call on them for help. And that would be bad public policy."

Clients advised not to talk

Yaws and Murphy are represented by Sacramento lawyer Phillip Mastagni, whose family law firm works for police unions across Northern California. Mastagni declined to let his clients be interviewed. He also said he would not discuss the case in detail.

"The lawsuit speaks for itself," Mastagni said. "But I just want to say this: We are confident that the firefighter's rule will not bar the claim."

Filed in El Dorado Superior Court, the lawsuit claims that Eddie Mies should have known that he was "afflicted with certain mental health conditions" that would result in dangerous and violent behavior.

It also states his parents knew or should have known that it was "necessary to avoid allowing Eddie Mies access to firearms," and were negligent in allowing him that access.

In addition to Eddie Mies and his parents, the lawsuit also names his brother Jacob as a defendant. It states that Jacob Mies misled the first officers who arrived at the scene by not immediately informing them that Eddie had killed his father.

Many of the claims cited in the suit are disputed by the Mies family.

The suit alleges Eddie Mies was a diagnosed schizophrenic – not true, according to his mother. She said his mental problems were undiagnosed because he resisted treatment.

"He began showing unusual symptoms and fears about six years before he died," she said. "We tried several times to have him evaluated – we even talked him into going to the emergency room a couple of times. The first time, a doctor talked to him for about five minutes. The next time, a 2-year-old was screaming in the waiting room and Eddie bolted."

The suit also claims the family should have known of "Eddie's mental illness, drug abuse, criminal history, paranoia and propensity for violence."

The criminal history, according to Karen Mies, amounts to traffic arrests in Reno and Wyoming.

'He was gentle and kind'

As for foreknowledge of violence, she said her son was clearly depressed but there was nothing to indicate he would snap. She contends the family had no reason to be wary – and that Eddie's murder of his father shows they were not.

"Eddie never appeared to be a danger to himself or anyone else," she said. "That would have been legal grounds to have him committed, but it never reached that point. He was gentle and kind."

The suit, which claims the deputies were the victims of a well-planned ambush, contains this depiction of the shootout's aftermath: "Eddie Mies was found dead in a bunker with a cache of weapons and ammunition, as well as a change of clothes. A survey of the property revealed an elaborate system of bunkers and tunnels."

This description leaves Karen Mies shaking her head. Her responses: The two weapons he used – a shotgun and a revolver – were guns he owned legally as an adult. The ammunition cache was an old toolbox holding bullets, birdshot and other odds and ends. The change of clothes was a jacket.

As for the bunkers and tunnels, Karen Mies led a walking tour of her 2 1/2 acres. She and Arthur raised their six children here; Eddie, the second youngest, was 2 when they moved in.

It's a typical foothills property – a small blue house on Shingle Road, a garden, several pickup trucks in various states of repair, quiet except for wind chimes and the bark of a distant dog. A neighboring property of similar size recently sold for $250,000.

American flags and patriotic ribbons decorate the fence in support of U.S. troops – Art Mies, who was 71 when he died, was a proud Air Force veteran.

Karen Mies walked past the memorial to her husband at the spot where he was sawing firewood when Eddie shot him in the back. She led the way up the hill, through dead corn that Eddie had planted near the small travel trailer where he was living the last year of his life.

She stopped at a wire fence on her property line and pointed to a shallow depression in the ground.

"There were a couple of holes up here where the kids used to play – they've been here for years," she said. She nodded toward a trail that wound away through the brush. "There are trails like that through the grass. When I read 'tunnels' and 'bunkers' in the lawsuit, I couldn't believe it."

Ballistics tests aren't finished

An official investigation of the incident might yield some answers. More than a year later, however, the El Dorado County District Attorney's Office still has not issued its findings. Ballistics tests by the state Department of Justice – to determine who shot whom – are also not finished.

Last month, the El Dorado County Sheriff's Department rejected The Bee's written request for results of its investigation into the Mies case.

Asked to comment on the deputies' lawsuit, Sheriff Jeff Neves sent an e-mail response: "A sheriff's employee is exercising his individual rights as a citizen and in doing so does not officially represent the department in any way."

Bill Clark, El Dorado County's chief deputy district attorney, said his office has been too busy to wind up the case. There have been three other deputy-involved fatal shootings in the county since Eddie Mies' death.

"There's just too much pressing stuff," Clark said. "I've read the results of the Mies investigation, I have an opinion on it, but I have to check the facts."

Greg Murphy now works for the El Dorado District Attorney's Office as an investigator. Jon Yaws is back at work as a deputy sheriff. Donder, the injured police dog, retired from service and is now "spoiled rotten," according to Melissa Meekma, who was the third deputy wounded that day.

Meekma's shoulder was shattered when a shot penetrated the seam of her bullet-proof vest. Healed physically but still struggling with post-traumatic stress, she took a medical retirement from the Sheriff's Department, effective June 30. She is 28.

Her own trials have made her sympathetic to the plight of the Mies family, Meekma said, and she has declined to sue them.

"I went through my own hard times, and I did some soul-searching," she said. "My job was to protect that day, and that's what I did. That's the risk I took – and I know the price I paid. I cannot imagine what Karen Mies went through, burying a husband and a son."

Meekma said she's made her peace with Eddie Mies.

"Part of my healing was to forgive Eddie Mies," she said. "He was very sick – he needed help, too. … I had nightmares for a while. When I decided not to be part of the lawsuit, my nightmares stopped."

Mom tries to understand son

Karen Mies says the loss of her husband of four decades – "my good guy" – is a constant ache. But it's the riddle of her son that haunts her.

"Eddie's life was tragic and sad – he was battling these demons, but he couldn't see that he had a problem and we couldn't get help for him," she said. "My consolation was that by living here with us, we knew he was safe. There was a warm, dry place in winter. He had food to eat.

"Parents want to fix things for their kids – it's hard when you can't fix it. So you hope and pray."

She stood in reverie near the family's memorial for Eddie. Here he died of his wounds after firing on an army of police for nearly an hour.

Does she ever think of moving away from the ghosts on Shingle Road?

 "No," she said, a little surprised by the question. "I belong here."

 

COMMENTS:

Cali4niaRags at 12:27 AM PST Sunday, August 10, 2008 said:

Isn't there something wrong with this picture?

Weren't the deputies doing their job when they went to the Mies' home? Ummm....I'm very confused.

4 out of 6 people found this comment helpful.

Was this comment helpful? Yes | No

Flag for review

Beesucksbad1 at 12:28 AM PST Sunday, August 10, 2008 said:

 

"With the firefighter's rule, the reasoning is that they voluntarily agreed to undertake these risks – they know going in that fighting crime or fighting fires is dangerous," said Julie Davies, a professor at McGeorge School of Law. When criminals commit crimes I kind of think they "agree to undertake these risks" also, but it doesn't stop them from filing suits when they get injured. The courts continually reward criminal activity with monetary gain, why not penalize the criminals?

2 out of 6 people found this comment helpful.

Was this comment helpful? Yes | No

Flag for review

rostoli at 12:32 AM PST Sunday, August 10, 2008 said:

 

4 million dollars is a bit excessive. I wonder how much the lawyer gets???? Parents cannot force thier adult children into psychiatric care, no matter how bad it is. If he was seen as a danger to hmself or others, he may have had an evaluation and a 72 hour stay in a hospital, but again, as an adult, he did not have to take any medication he may have been perscribed.Not to mention he was not exhibiting dangerous behavior. Yes, the wounded officers have thier own wounds to heal, but how do you take 4 million dollars from a woman(Karen) who does not have anywhere near that kind of money,and had to bury her husband that died by her son's hands. Leave her alone.

8 out of 10 people found this comment helpful.

Was this comment helpful? Yes | No

Flag for review

rostoli at 12:36 AM PST Sunday, August 10, 2008 said:

Beesucksbad1

You stated, "The courts continually reward criminal activity with monetary gain, why not penalize the criminals?" The criminal is dead and buried, and his Mom is a grieveng widow. No one condones what Eddie did, but you cannot sue a ghost.......he paid for his crimes with his life, and his Mom has to suffer because of it.

2 out of 4 people found this comment helpful.

Was this comment helpful? Yes | No

Flag for review

vanbaaren at 12:48 AM PST Sunday, August 10, 2008 said:

unbelievable

I'm embarrassed for these 2 "officers". Have they no shame?

7 out of 8 people found this comment helpful.

Was this comment helpful? Yes | No

Flag for review

cvc23111 at 12:57 AM PST Sunday, August 10, 2008 said:

 

Looks like a tie-died Berkerly Hippie grad in the photo to me........dude what were you think'n ??????

1 out of 5 people found this comment helpful.

Was this comment helpful? Yes | No

Flag for review

taco_man at 1:00 AM PST Sunday, August 10, 2008 said:

And they call themselves Servants of the People

The Bee should change the article to read that the officers were 'humiliated' after they filed the law suit.

2 out of 4 people found this comment helpful.

Was this comment helpful? Yes | No

Flag for review

cniht76 at 1:14 AM PST Sunday, August 10, 2008 said:

Under Review

cniht76 at 1:20 AM PST Sunday, August 10, 2008 said:

 

remember folks, if you also have to defend yourself from criminal predation whether it is a street scumbag or a scumbag with a badge and a serious ego trip. Shoot To Kill! So your poor old mother doesn't get sued out of house and home.

4 out of 6 people found this comment helpful.

Was this comment helpful? Yes | No

Flag for review

billb1536 at 1:47 AM PST Sunday, August 10, 2008 said:

What?

What a huge slap in the face to peace officers everywhere. This is the type of event that we pay our police and sheriff's officers to handle. Talk about weak character on their part. How can they look in the mirror or face family and friends? All to try and get some cash. These selfish greedy cops,hired to do this type of work, have done more to weaken civilian cops relations than they can possibly imagine. But now that I think about it...obviously they could care less about anyone or anything except themselves. Just the complete opposite of the type of person we want and need in this profession. Hope this case gets thrown out before it get's started. And their careers and personal image shattered so they become outcasts. Would serve them right.

4 out of 4 people found this comment helpful.

Was this comment helpful? Yes | No

Flag for review

ca_expat_in_nj at 2:17 AM PST Sunday, August 10, 2008 said:

Under Review

bayareasam at 2:26 AM PST Sunday, August 10, 2008 said:

 

Yet more scum masquerading as public servants. These guys get paid huge salaries with ridiculous benefits, and yet they don't want to take the risks that come with the job. It's no wonder many of the public do not view law enforcement as on our side. They are on their own side and are in it for the money and priviledge. A badge should not confer up them extraordinary rights that regular citizens do not have. The next time a benefits and salary increase comes up for a public vote, VOTE NO!!!

4 out of 4 people found this comment helpful.

Was this comment helpful? Yes | No

Flag for review

gerry12 at 2:43 AM PST Sunday, August 10, 2008 said:

Good for you Melissa....

...I applaud you for doing the right thing. I'm embarrassed for your colleagues in their legal action against this woman. What are they thinking?!?!?!? Thanks for your common sense and compassion.

6 out of 6 people found this comment helpful.

Was this comment helpful? Yes | No

Flag for review

mrcold24 at 3:00 AM PST Sunday, August 10, 2008 said:

Sue?

I am amazed at these two...officers?? Server and protect?? I must remember to check the side of the next El Dorado sheriffs car I see. But, back to suing someone. I truly hope this woman gets some legal help and that these...officers??? in turn get sued. How about the two heros waiting for back up? Nope, thought they could handle it? Guess not. Bet they figured that they would be faster and better. Well, I am happy they lived. I have many, MANY friends and family in law enforcement. Some good, some bad. They put their lives on the line each and ever day and I am proud of them and their brothers and sisters. Its a job I don't want and could not handle. But I really hope the widow in this case hires a proper attorney and they investigate the officers involved deeply, as deeply as the family will be. I wish no ill will but its what your paid for. Next firefighters will begin suing also......scary, scary....

4 out of 4 people found this comment helpful.

Was this comment helpful? Yes | No

Flag for review

mltpsych at 3:10 AM PST Sunday, August 10, 2008 said:

Disgusting

These so called officers are still at work collecting a salary and now are trying to sue a grieving mother and widow. I am appalled at the greed of these two men and the attorney who is harassing this poor woman. Leave her alone and look at the example of your former colleague who did not give in to the pressure of greed and the ambulance chasing attorney. I applaud Melissa for moving on and not taking advantage of our legal system and more tax dollars.

4 out of 4 people found this comment helpful.

Was this comment helpful? Yes | No

Flag for review

btsacbee at 3:25 AM PST Sunday, August 10, 2008 said:

???

I must have misunderstood the facts of the incident. The son shot the father and the officers, but now somehow the mother is responsible for what her 34 year old adult son did. I dont care if she knew he was full tilt looney. If your parents are liable for what you do at age 34 as an adult then we are all in for some trouble. I dont see this being successful in court, maybe the attorney thinks that they can get a settlement from the homeowners insurance company because the incident occurred on the parents property.

3 out of 3 people found this comment helpful.

Was this comment helpful? Yes | No

Flag for review

happyboy72848 at 3:29 AM PST Sunday, August 10, 2008 said:

I Don't Understand

I don't understand the need for this lawsuit of a woman who lost a son and a husband. She lost everything and, in my opinion, seems to be truthful about the mental condition and general demeanor of her son. Sometimes we just can't predict the actions of those fighting mental disorders. It's certainly not negligence on the part of the parents when they try to have their ADULT son seek help. Most of us reading this article see such a lawsuit as greedy and unnecessary on the parts of the plaintiffis. Melissa has the correct perspective on the happenings and the aftermath. God bless all of those affected by this tragedy, but we must remember that the Officers were paid to do their job and knew the nature of such employment when they accepted their pay and benefits. Gentlemen, please leave the Mother to her grief and whatever she has left.

4 out of 4 people found this comment helpful.

Was this comment helpful? Yes | No

Flag for review

man007 at 4:59 AM PST Sunday, August 10, 2008 said:

 

Shame on you, LE's for sueing this woman, it is plain shameful. I am having less respect for cops because of stuff like this and thing that happen at the Yolo Courthouse.

2 out of 3 people found this comment helpful.

Was this comment helpful? Yes | No

Flag for review

shilagirl at 5:30 AM PST Sunday, August 10, 2008 said:

they should be embarrassed, and ashamed...

police officers choose this line of work knowing the risks involved, and if they're injured on the job I'm sure they're collecting their usual pay and all their medical expenses are covered, so I don't understand why they're suing... No one should be held liable for the behavior of their adult children, they have no control over their actions, they can't make them behave the way they'd like, and they can't force them to get medical treatment... and it seems this woman has nothing so what do they want from her? What's the point of suing for something they'll never be able to collect? I don't consider her property an asset to be sold off so they can have the measly $250-300,000.00. She still needs to be able to support herself for the rest of her life and she has to have a roof over her head. Are they trying to punish her for something that's not her fault? Leave the poor woman in peace. She's already lost a husband and a son, must they leave her with nothing?

3 out of 3 people found this comment helpful.

Was this comment helpful? Yes | No

Flag for review

Beggar at 6:01 AM PST Sunday, August 10, 2008 said:

 

These cops are pathetic. They're nothing but money-hungry punks. I pray I get selected to this jury.

1 out of 2 people found this comment helpful.

Was this comment helpful? Yes | No

Flag for review

pepper95823 at 6:23 AM PST Sunday, August 10, 2008 said:

I don't understand

I really think MELISSA MEEKMA is a wonderful person not suing the poor woman of something she had no control of. As for the other two people I don't see how you sleep at night. The son was over 18 and grown. Leave the poor woman alone and move on. You knew what you were getting into when you became a sheriff. Question to Beesucksbad1: you stated The courts continually reward criminal activity with monetary gain why not penalize the criminals. The young man is dead.......... Are you saying that the mother of this 34 year old young man is a criminal?

0 out of 0 people found this comment helpful.

Was this comment helpful? Yes | No

Flag for review

maze51 at 6:30 AM PST Sunday, August 10, 2008 said:

Maybe I should sue the two officers

for emotional distress. I cannot believe these two officers are still in uniform and possibly carrying a gun if the Mies incident left them so distraught that they felt compelled to file such an undignified lawsuit. Shame on them.......

0 out of 0 people found this comment helpful.

Was this comment helpful? Yes | No

Flag for review

 

============================================================

Son battled officers; now mom fights suit
Year after Shingle Springs shootout, deputies seek $8 million from widow
By Dorothy Korber - dkorber@sacbee.com

Published 12:00 am PDT Sunday, August 10, 2008
Story appeared in MAIN NEWS section, Page A1

Published 12:00 am PDT Sunday, August 10, 2008
Story appeared in MAIN NEWS section, Page A1

http://www.sacbee.com/101/story/1145192-p3.html
Copyright © The Sacramento Bee
2100 Q St. P.O. Box 15779 Sacramento, CA 95816 (916) 321-1000

Technorati Tags: